Saturday, December 5, 2020

Going on safari in Tanzania during the pandemic

 Photos and Article by Tony Mangia


Anticipation ran high the morning we loaded up two tan-colored, over-sized Landcruisers with gear and 11 passengers (all volunteers in Tanzania), two chefs and our guides at the start of our safari excursion to Serengeti National Park from a hostel in Arusha.



Our Tanzanian driver and guide was Ali, an amiable man with a seemingly vast knowledge of the park and the scores of wildlife we we all expected to see over the next four days.


Ali told us it was dry season on the Serengeti plains and that many of the giant herds (like wildebeest) were still making their way south from Kenya, but, outside the scarcity of some breeds, we should be able to see the Big Five — specifically lions, rhinos, elephants, leopards and water buffaloes. Ever the antagonist, I questioned why the buffalo were part of this esteemed bunch — and not cheetahs or hippos — but there they were listed along the top guns.



Our volunteer organization, IVHQ, booked our safari with Tanzanian Host Experience and introduced Ali and another guide, who went by the solo moniker, Johnson, to us two nights before the trip during an orientation on what was included (tents, sleeping bags, three meals and 1-1/2 liters of water per day), what we should bring (jackets, snacks and cameras), what facilities the campsite had (toilets and showers) and what we could expect to see (The Big Five). The cost — $700USD per person.


The pair expressed optimism about the dry-season weather and prospects for animal sightings, but apologized about the natural absence of the dramatic wildebeest migration at this time of the year. Most of the migratory herds were were still heading south from Kenya.



No apology was necessary for Mother Nature's ways.



But times were tough in Tanzania — as they were around the world — because of COVID. Financial hardships for the safari workers over the past two seasons was something they couldn't control. The virus had kept visitors away and dwindled safari tourism down to almost a fraction of what it normally is. I heard the same sad refrain while climbing Mt. Kilimanjaro two weeks earlier, when my guide, Michael, said his crew was also feeling the pinch. He told me he usually led two trek parties a month, but that my solo climb was his first in over six months.


Ali told us that this was his first safari outing since March. And being that we were headed into October, it was a sobering timetable of how long COVID is affecting different people and various economies all over the world.


We set out on our comfortable 8-hour drive from Arusha with stops to pick up snacks and see the giant crater at the Ngorongoro Conservation Area. It is heart of the Masai tribe region and gateway to the sub-Saharan plains leading to Serengeti. When Ali pointed out a small heard of wildebeest at the crater’s lake in the distance, the swell of excitement almost raised the vehicle’s retractable roof by itself. It was especially uplifting after our cruiser overheated on a steep incline and each of us passengers each donated water from our bottles.




“Our one-and-a-half liter ration of hydration just became a half,” I joked, to a couple of sighs, and before the steaming cruiser moved on.


It wasn’t long after we entered Serengeti National Park before we spotted a pride of lions and a couple of young adults sitting on a towering rock looking down over the landscape like some still shot out of The Lion King.



We were stoked for the next day to start after numerous giraffes and zebras seemed to welcome us into the park before we finally arrived at the sparsely populated campsite at dusk. The long ride was already worth it.



We had dinner — spaghetti bolognese and warmed pineapple slices slathered in Masai honey for desert — before I took a walk around the campsite under an amazingly clear sky. While lying down outside my tent to stare at the twinkling canopy of stars, the sound of hyenas making these haunting sounds — a mixture of laughing and yelping — surrounded the camp. In between upward glances at the Milky Way, I turned towards the chilling calls on all sides.  Ali warned us about the hyenas, but assured us that they were more snarl than harm and wouldn’t approach anyone, but that did little to curb my apprehension — especially when I shined my headlamp into the neighboring brush and could see all these unblinking red eyes watching me back. 


Despite Ali's Hakuna Matata (no problem) attitude, I slept with my Leatherman knife blade out on my bed anyway.


There was a 5 am breakfast of crepes and fruit before we headed out for a sunrise safari the next day.  


We raised the retractable roof and the smells and sounds of a Serengeti morning filled the vehicle as the sun came up. All twelve eyes inside our cruiser were peeled on the horizon searching for anything that moved. In the distance a hot air balloon made its way across the new sun-splashed plains before hovering above a herd of elephants.



From a distance we could see the matron of the parade move towards the balloon’s basket and wave its trunk at the humans inside. A gesture that could have meant hello as easy as go away. Either or, it made for some fantastic photos.


Later, after a picnic lunch on a dried up river bank, we got up close and personal with a pride of lions — with about a dozen cubs — lounging around, indifferent to our close proximity, and more interested in hiding from the sun under a lone umbrella-shaped tree in the middle of nowhere. We got so close to the cubs, yet felt no danger from the blasé moms, that it was almost impossible to not fantasize about jumping out of the vehicle to scratch their fuzzy ears.



We continued our safari, spotting dozens of giraffes, water buffalo, zebra, ostriches and lots of cheetahs. There was an amazing encounter with an angry elephant bull who blocked the road and swirled the end of his trunk in the dirt as warning to us as his pack crossed. 



The real action started when Ali got a call on the radio that a rhino was spotted (pretty rare during the dry season) and we bolted from a group of giraffes (becoming pretty common now) to a spot about 20 minutes away where there was already about a dozen other safari parties.



The rhino was about a half mile on a ridge and hard to see, but luckily I had my 400mm telephoto lens and was able to get a few snapshots. There are strict penalties for safari vehicles — besides humans — to venture off the dirt roads to get close to the animals, so we watched the two-horned black rhino from afar.




It was quite a scene as more vehicles showed up and, like some dust-clouded, motorized desert caravan, followed its slow movement as it grazed across the horizon. 


All that was left to see of the Big Five in their natural habitat was the elusive leopard.


Then it was off the main road, towards a large water hole filled with hippos. There was a wooden railing (To keep humans at bay) constructed alongside a small cliff about 20-feet from the water’s edge. It’s a pretty well known fact that hippos are aggressive mammals and kill more people than any other animals in Africa. Like rush hour on the NYC subways I remember, they huddled together amicably, then suddenly jostled another for more room in their cramped watery space. Come to think of it, the water hole smelled like the subway too.



After dinner — a delicious fried fish stew that we devoured like a pack of hyenas — and intermediate wi-fi connections to social media, there was a campfire and the social chatter it brings. We rehashed our day and hoped we would get to see a leopard on our way out of the park — thus completing the Big Five.


At breakfast in the mess tent, there were excited murmurs coming from some of the campers about a lion last night — that someone had heard loud growling. 


Ali confirmed the rumor as true and said a couple of curious lionesses had passed through — probably searching for their coalition. I slept right through it. He then went on to tell us about a water buffalo that was attacked and dragged through the same campsite last year by half-a-dozen lions one morning. He pointed to the spot by the kitchen where the lone beast was felled and then tugged away. When asked what the campers did, Ali laughed and said they all grabbed their cell phones to take photos. I was guessing he saved that grisly story for last day for a reason.



And I probably would have slept through that too since I found myself more astonished that morning by another wardrobe change by the young ladies in the other cruiser. While I wore the same clothes (one shirt change) for the whole trip, it seemed they had three different outfits for each day, and hundreds of selfies to prove it. I scratched my head trying to figure out where they stored more attire than a Vogue photo shoot.




Anyway, before we made our last exit from the campsite Saturday morning, I could see the campsite start to fill up with tents for the weekend. And, although I usually hate crowds, it was heartening to see other tourists and vehicles because it meant that tour workers, park rangers and the animals, respectively, could all benefit from the injection of more tourist money into the economy.



The final drive out of the park was almost as eventful as the other three days. There were more hippos, lions and elephants, before, over the radio, we heard exuberant chatter that a leopard had been spotted by another group.


Ali turned and told us to all sit tight, then made a beeline for the tree our spotted recluse was reportedly napping in. I don’t know how Ali navigated to the correct location, but, after a dusty, bumpy 30-minute ride, we got to see (with a little eye-squinting) the beautiful beast almost completely camouflaged on the thick tree branch, oblivious to the vehicles, open-mouthed people and clicking cameras below. Only a trained safari guide would have been able to spot it in a single glance from the road.



So just like that — the Big Five!


Nearing the park's eastern gate, and still in the brushy flatlands, a cheetah jumped onto the cab of the other open-roofed cruiser in front of us, on top of its occupants and in full view of us. While the speedy cat's action was more out of finding a higher vantage point to look for prey, rather than some sweet goodbye gesture, we accepted it as a parting gift.



And what a fine farewell it was.


More photos:

Friday, June 5, 2020

Did Drew Brees Have To Apologize For Having An Opinion?

By Tony Mangia

The notorious one-two punch of cancel culture and social media has once again shamed and bullied another prominent public figure onto the canvas by dismissing his first amendment rights and, at the same time, bring a good man to both knees for speaking his mind.

These technological beatdowns are all too common in our country these days and always seem to be in retaliation for anyone whom the Twitter social justice warriors deem to be in denial of one of their causes or gripes.

This time it’s family man and all-around good guy Drew Brees who has been cyber-bullied into an apology for voicing an opinion which didn’t jive with the Issue du Jour during an interview with Yahoo Finance — namely kneeling during the national anthem.



Submit or be condemned seems to be the norm nowadays.

Kneeling protests — started by former NFL player Colin Kaepernick four years ago — are once again a controversial sports talking point after the tragic, unnecessary police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis —even though no pro athletes are even suited up and may not be for a long time due to the COVID-19 lockdown.

On Wednesday, Brees, the perennially liked and respected quarterback for the New Orleans Saints — that’s until he voiced his opinion — was overwhelmed with criticism for having the audacity to say he doesn't agree with anyone kneeling during the pre-game playing of “The Star-Spangled Banner” out of respect for the servicemen and women who have sacrificed their lives for our country.

Brees said:
“I will never agree with anybody disrespecting the flag of the United States of America or our country. Let me just tell what I see or what I feel when the national anthem is played and when I look at the flag of the United States. I envision my two grandfathers, who fought for this country during World War II, one in the Army and one in the Marine Corps.

"Not just those in the military, but for that matter, those throughout the civil rights movements of the ‘60s, and all that has been endured by so many people up until this point. And is everything right with our country right now? No, it is not.

"But I think what you do by standing there and showing respect to the flag with your hand over your heart, is it shows unity. It shows that we are all in this together, we can all do better and that we are all part of the solution.”

Brees cited the military — a general reference to the men and women who have sacrificed their lives for our rights, including freedom of speech, during the Revolutionary War which our country was borne, the Civil War which helped abolish slavery, the World Wars ending genocide and every battle under our flag up until this day. He mentioned his grandfathers who served and praised the protestors of the civil rights movements who fought their own struggles as Americans as well.

The line, “I will never agree with anybody disrespecting the flag of the United States of America” from the interview is what seems to hit a sore spot with his critics. It suggests Brees considers anyone who kneels disrespectful of the flag and our country. It's hard to think a person like Brees meant it to be anything like that but, on the other side, it’s just as easy to  assume angry players are kneeling just to show contempt of all police — most of whom don’t deserve it — too.

Later, Brees apologized for his remarks by saying, "I will do better."


But how could all of the offended groups and individuals — including some teammates and fellow athletes who know Brees and played alongside him for years — twist Brees viewpoint into an anti-black sentiment and then spread it like a pandemic all over social media?

It’s easy with the power of mob mentality and a far-reaching social media following like LeBron James has.



That's the same LeBron who, among numerous NBA players, threw his support behind China and tossed the freedom-fighting protestors in Hong Kong under the corporate bus.

Brees is a family man, the father of four children who was front and center helping victims of Hurricane Katrina and is a long-time and well-known charitable member of the mostly black New Orleans community. Brees has probably done more for the city than any other player on the team and deserved to be given a chance to explain his thoughts —  if they weren't  clear enough in the interview — prior to being publicly chastised and before the same people who probably accepted his charity in the past started chanting, “F—k Drew Brees“ during a protest in NOLA the other night.

Malcom Jenkins, Brees’ teammate of five years before joining the Eagles and re-signing with the Saints in March, gave an emotional and honest rebuke of Brees first amendment rights by comparing playing football to a war and battle field. 

“The same brothers you break the huddle down with every single game,” he said on a Twitter video. “Guys you bleed with, go into battle with have to go home to communities that have been decimated…”



While Brees was recognizing the sacrifices of real service men and women as his motive to not kneel and salute the flag during the national anthem, Jenkins was using that tired, old sports war cliche comparing playing a game where 22 grown men line up to push a ball across a field to actual combat and how it seems he might not want Brees back in those million dollar pigskin trenches. Maybe there’s some deep rooted animosity there? I doubt it and haven’t heard anything to the contrary but, I have definitely never heard a word about Brees being racist before all this.

Brees’ philanthropic efforts go far beyond the ordinary man, or most NFL players for that fact.  His passion for giving back to the fans includes all races and Brees has nothing to prove otherwise. The NFL star's extracurricular actions have already spoken louder than a few misconstrued words. Being strong-armed to apologize — especially by teammates — was basically an insult to the man's character as a whole.

But a couple of black Saints players did come to Brees’ defense.

Former Saints wide receiver Joe Horn, who told The Athletic’s Jeff Duncan that Brees “has done a lot to help black families and the black community in New Orleans” but still said he needs “a chance to think about what he said and come back and make this right.”

And current Saints defensive end Marcus Davenport tweeted that although people don’t have to entirely agree with Brees, he wasn’t talking about the “current protest, the riots or anything besides HIS feelings on kneeling.”





It’s a topsy-turvy world we live in these days where only a week ago law-abiding citizens were arrested for opening up their gyms or cutting people’s hair to pay their bills while law-breaking punks ran free looting, rioting and running amok in our streets. And when a couple of Ivy League lawyers only get charged with causing damage by fire and explosives after handing out molotov cocktails to rioters and tossing a lit one into an occupied police cruiser, you know perspectives are askew.

Kneeling prompts a brittle and fine line between what is considered a symbol of anti-police brutality or just plain police hatred that we sadly must decipher in these times.

So, down the road, will standing with your hand over your heart during the national anthem be considered racist? Does kneeling mean you are disrespecting the police, the military or the flag? 

What about what you say or tweet?  It’s hard to tell what passes for a political “dog whistle” these days. 

There are many players and personnel who have been rightfully cut or fired for outright racist or threatening tweets or remarks but when Sacramento Kings broadcaster, Grant Napear, is canned for tweeting “all lives matter” when asked by NBA player, DeMarcus Cousins, about his opinion on the Black Lives Matter movement, it leaves you wondering where that signal starts and ends. Napear was fired after a controversy-free, 32-year career.  

Drew Brees should not be the scapegoat for all that angers many of us. He didn't condemn anyone for kneeling during the national anthem in addressing that hot button question. Brees plainly said he will stand during "The Star-Bangled Banner" to honor our military. And he deserved better than getting caught up in this whirlwind of protests, agitation and symbolistic politics.

We all do.

If you want to kneel during the national anthem, kneel. If you want to stand during the national anthem, stand.

But don't apologize for it.

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

Should Fans Blame Owners or Players If MLB Season Is Cancelled


By Tony Mangia

While MLB owners and the player’s union present their proposals for the 2020 season to commence after the COVID-19 virus pandemic flattens out, a complicated financial and health concern battle is taking place between the two sides. But to fans looking in, the real question is whether the owners or the players will be held responsible for sealing or breaking a deal which ushers in a new season of baseball.

And most fans don’t care if they throw spitballs at each other, the only curve they care about isn’t a pandemic, it’s a pitch.

Photo illustration by Tony Mangia


It’s been over two  months since MLB locked its gates. The normal pent-up anticipation of a new baseball season compounded with the onset of the pandemic lockdown has left home-confined fans with a huge sports void many have never experienced in their lives. 

There were some intriguing major league storylines which were on the hot stove before the COVID-19 hit. They included would Gerrit Cole’s presence help get the Yankees over their World Series slump? Could Mike Trout win his fourth MVP — and two in a row — or are the Mets rotation and the Dodgers lineup as good as advertised. 

So without a 2020 season, fans will never get to see how many times an Astros player gets hit by a pitch either.  Come to think about it, if the season does resume with no fans in the stands, the villainous Astros might be the only team happy to welcome the stadium void because it means not getting booed incessantly at each away game. 

If the season does get a reboot, a host of intriguing developments might include how that newly instituted universal DH rule will affect the National League game strategy or how many times players get thrown out of a game for spitting. And how that forehead thermometer in the dugout becoming more important than the radar gun behind home plate?

It’ll also be interesting to see if any high-profile celebrity fans get use of the private viewing suites for a price. My money is on Jay-Z, Jerry Seinfeld or Charlie Sheen.  After all, Sheen did buy a whole seating section of an Angels game just so he could catch a foul ball.

All moot points if the season is cancelled.

Like most American’s lives, almost every aspect of MLB has been impacted by COVID-19. Besides the complete shutdown of the season, the Hall of Fame has since announced its annual induction weekend will not be held as planned this July. Instead, the Hall of Fame hopes to hold a tandem induction weekend in 2021. The draft, meanwhile, has been shortened to five rounds, with draftees receiving significantly less money over the next two years.

So, with plenty of time to contemplate — or stew — in solitude, who will the fans side with or blame if the 2020 MLB season is cancelled?

It’s logical to think that the typical sports fan can sort of relate to the players — more than owners — because most fans are usually salaried workers too. But those same fans might draw a line at that bromance with the professional athletes whom they often perceive as pampered prima donnas making in a single game what the average working stiff earns in a year … playing a game at that!

But their perception of fat cat team owners with stacks of old money isn't exactly relatable either.

So on those points, let's call it a push between blaming the owners and players.

Owners-1 Players-1.

Last week, the owners and MLB commissioner Rob Manfred sent a proposal to MLBPA and the two sides began negotiations to salvage the season and, in some cases, some franchises. 

The league’s proposal includes an early July target date for Opening Day. Other plans include the afore mentioned universal DH, an expanded postseason field, precautionary health measures and a revenue-sharing plan that would lead to players taking pro-rated pay reductions. Besides the minuscule health concerns, that pay cut  — for the lighter workload —  is already a major sticking point with the player’s union. 

And, if only getting paid for games they actually play chafes the players' rosin bags, well, that  is one negotiating issue where the average sports fan will most likely side with the owners and not the players. 

Owners-2 Players-1.

Several players have already spoken out since MLB's proposal was approved by the owners and submitted to the MLBPA —  and it includes a couple of big names. But, if it comes down to these highly-paid players refusing to take a pay cut causing the season to be cancelled, this might be the last straw for the fans when they take sides.

Can you say boycott?

Adam Jones, who played 14 seasons in the big leagues and is currently with the Orix Buffaloes in Japan, called on the game's star players to speak out against the proposal. Some have, including the Tampa Bay Rays Cy Young-winning pitcher Blake Snell.




“Bro, I’m risking my life. … If I’m going to play, I should be getting the money I signed to be getting paid.,” Snell opined. “I should not be getting half of what I’m getting paid because the season’s cut in half, on top of a 33 percent cut of the half that’s already there — so I’m really getting, like, 25 percent. On top of that, it’s getting taxed. So imagine how much I’m actually making to play, you know what I’m saying?

“I’m just saying, it doesn’t make sense for me to lose all of that money and then go play. And then be on lockdown, not around my family, not around the people I love …”

A lot of people trashed Snell for sounding motivated by money and not the game, but one one of the league’s biggest and most recognizable stars backed him.

“He ain’t lying, he’s speaking the truth bro. I ain’t mad at him.” said Phillies star, Bryce Harper, about Snell’s statement. “Somebody’s gotta say it, at least he manned up and said it. Good for him.”

Snell, as well as other players on his side, might see this as righteous, but many fans see him as greedy, self-serving and ungrateful to have a job. A lot of fans remember the baseball strike of 1981 and see this 2020 showdown as another hard-headed owners vs. over-paid players battle which leaves the fans out.

Think about all of the people out of work these days, struggling to pay their rents and mortgages and actually protesting to get back to their jobs. This might be the majority of the MLB fan base. It’s definitely not the main stream media talking heads and do-nothing politicians who preach to the masses about staying home while all that time they are still collecting a paycheck.

Score another run for the league. Owners-3 Players-1.

Granted, that with fans watching games on TV in the safety of their own homes and owners doing it from sanitized suites and mansions, it is the players who are taking all of the real health risks. But how much of a threat could it be for players to play in empty stadiums, with limited and distanced staff and personnel, special transportation, sanitized housing and the best preventive measures and professionals to keep them safe? You come in more contact with people scouring the aisles for toilet paper at Walmart.

And why wouldn’t games played in front of empty stands work? Fan-less baseball games seem to be okay in South Korea.



The KBO started regular season games in early May and could be a good template for how MLB can handle playing in front of empty stadiums. The world’s third largest professional baseball league has instituted new COVID-19 rules which include: players having their temperatures checked twice a day; everyone not in a baseball uniform, including umpires and athletic trainers, wearing face masks and gloves; if a player shows symptoms, he'll be immediately quarantined and they'll close the stadium where he played his most recent game; if he tests positive for the virus, contact tracing will figure out others who need to be quarantined for two weeks. 

And while nothing will ever replace the aromas and energy of a packed crowd, maybe teams could fill the stadium with piped in crowd noise and music to distract the players from boredom?

Not exactly peanuts and crackerjacks, but it’s glimmer of hope that someday you will be able to go back.

MLB’s proposed early July starting date would be enough time to see a leveling out of the pandemic curve and allow for at least an 82-game schedule. The owners have also proposed a 50/50 split of revenues with the players and that’s where it gets fiscally complicated. 

Without paying customers, concessions, souvenir or parking receipts, most of the income will be from broadcast rights (and there should be abnormally large audiences). MLB owners have already announced that they will lose $640K per game without fans totaling $4 billion in final losses by the end of the season. A lot of specifics of the bottom line have to be plainly laid out regarding this untested and hastily-conceived revenue-sharing system between the union and owners and all of the accounting angles that comes with it. Essentially, the players will still be get a paycheck — with a pro-rated paycut —while the owners take all of the financial risks with a shortened and ticketless season. It remains to be seen if the odd coupling of owners and players can share millions in profits without driving each other crazy. 


Outside of baseball tradition and continuity, there are many reasons to cheer for the reinstatement of baseball. First of which is that it’s a return to business as usual — or at least as much a return to normalcy in our lives we could hope for right now.

It sounds like the owners have laid out some reasonable compromises where they'll be looking at a probable financial loss, while the players risk a minimal health concern and at least get a paycheck. Money is really where it all seems to boil down to so I'd give the owners a slight edge over the greedy players for taking a hit on their bottom line. 

Owners win, 4-1. So you can hold the players responsible if the 2020 season is cancelled.



And if beaning Astros and a Yankees’ World Series revenge weren’t incentive enough for baseball to get back on track, Bartolo Colon has declared that he wants to slip a uniform over his portly, 47-year-old body one last time. 

So owners and players, if not for any other reason to come an agreement, just do it for Big Sexy..